MAINSPRING PRESS: Award-Winning Research in Historic Recordings

  
  •
HOME

  • CATALOG

  • ORDERING

  CARUSO ARCHIVE

   LINKS

   COMPANY

  • CONTACTS

  • NEWS



Mainspring Press Publications

 

The Mainspring
A Free Online Journal from Mainspring Press                              
                  CONTENTS


The Origins of Okeh logo

By Allan Sutton

Label photos adapted from the
American Record Label Image Encyclopedia

The late George Blacker spent many years researching what he termed the "Pennsylvania Vertical Group" (PVG), a cluster of seemingly related 78 record brands produced in the Philadelphia area from 1912 through early 1918. Inevitably, his research led him to investigate an alleged link between the PVG labels and Okeh.

Blacker interest in this link was piqued by Fred Hager's claim, made many years after the supposed event, that the Otto Heineman Phonograph Supply Company (manufacturer of Okeh records) had gotten its start by acquiring assets of the Rex Talking Machine Corporation of Philadelphia. There seemed little reason to doubt Hager's story. After all, he had been Okeh's first musical director and a leading figure in the label's growth, and researchers of the period accepted his account without question. Blacker, however, eventually came to dispute Hager's claim based on largely circumstantial evidence, which he outlined at length in Record Research magazine.

But Fred Hager was correct.

Evidence gleaned from 1918 issues of The Talking Machine World confirms that Heineman acquired Rex's studio in 1918. Less certain, but still highly probable, is that Heineman also acquired Horace Sheble's Domestic pressing plant at about the same time.

The article that follows examines the early years of Okeh as well as the histories of the ill-fated companies that gave rise to this major American label.


By the time Otto Heineman introduced his Okeh label in May 1918, the vertical-cut disc had established a niche in the American market. Beginning in 1910, a few American record manufacturers attempted to challenge Victor and Columbia's domination of the 78 record market by employing the vertical, or "hill-and-dale" cut, which - unlike the standard lateral cut - did not enjoy patent protection in the United States. Many new record companies joined the fray in the years around the outbreak of World War I. A few would survive and thrive. Two that did not became the foundation upon which Heineman would build his legendary Okeh label.

The Keen-O-Phone / Rex / Imperial Group

The roots of Okeh's first recording studio can be traced back to the Keen-O-Phone Company, ancestor of the later Rex label.
The Talking Machine World for February 15, 1908 announced that the Keen-O-Phone Company had been incorporated in Delaware by Monroe Keen, Gustave Lyon, and Alfred Gordon. Doing business in Philadelphia, Keen-O-Phone initially marketed phonographs but did not produce records until 1912, when it unveiled its sapphire-ball vertically cut Keen-O-Phone discs.

For its musical director, Keen-O-Phone recruited Fred Hager, a violinist and recording pioneer whose work dated to the earliest years of commercial record production, from the nearly defunct Boston Talking Machine Company (makers of Phono-Cut vertically cut discs). In 1912 a large market for vertical discs had not yet developed in the United States, and after two years of weak sales Keen-O-Phone was reorganized as the Rex Talking Machine Corporation of Philadelphia. Incorporated in Delaware in 1914, Rex retained Fred Hager as musical director. Charles A. Hibbard—an expert studio technician who had trained at Edison before moving to the United States Phonograph Co., makers of U.S. Everlasting cylinders—was recruited as recording engineer. The company either operated or contracted its work to Hibbard's new studio at 35 West Thirty-First Street, New York, and operated a pressing plant at 9 Vandever Avenue in Wilmington, Delaware.

With a large backlog of Keen-O-Phone masters to draw upon, Rex's first catalog (which continued Keen-O-Phone's 5000-series catalog numbers for popular releases) was an ambitious one. Rex also supplied pressings to several client labels, including Empire, Imperial (unrelated to the earlier Leeds & Catlin brand), McKinley, Mozart (unrelated to the earlier International Record Company brand), Playerphone, and Rishell. Most of these labels duplicated Rex's couplings and catalog numbers.


Imperial Records ad from Talking Machine World

One of the last known Imperial advertisements
(Talking Machine World, January 1918)

Rex apparently underwent a final reorganization, as the Imperial Talking Machine Company, in mid-to-late 1917. The November 1917 Talking Machine World trade directory cited Imperial (which, like its predecessor, was incorporated in Delaware) as the manufacturer of Rex as well as Imperial discs. By the end of 1917, however, the newer Imperial label seems to have supplanted Rex entirely. A January 1918 Imperial advertisement claimed a catalog of more than 2,000 selections, a feat that likely would have been impossible for the newcomer had it not had access to the tremendous inventory of existing Rex and Keen-O-Phone material. Imperial also produced new releases at the former Rex facilities, extending Rex's catalog numbering series from the point at which Rex ceased operation. The Keen-O-Phone - Rex - Imperial line came to an end in early 1918, with the last known Imperial releases listed in the Talking Machine World for February 15, 1918.

Confirmation of an Okeh—Rex connection appears in the Talking Machine World's October 1919 history of the Otto Heineman Phonograph Supply Company, which states that Heineman did indeed purchase the "record laboratory controlled by Messrs. Hibbard and Hager" - in other words, the former Rex-Imperial studio.

Why, then, didn't older Rex and Imperial material appear under the Okeh label? That was the question that led George Blacker to dispute Hager's statement in the first place. After all, a six-year accumulation of master recordings would have provided a ready-made catalog perfectly suited for a new label. Unfortunately, we can only guess at the answer. In all likelihood, Hibbard and Hager were operating as independent contractors to Rex, but didn't own rights to the material the produced; or perhaps Heineman's perfectionistic personality dictated that his new label start from scratch. Whatever the reason, no evidence has been found to date of Rex material having been reissued on Okeh.

Horace Sheble and the Domestic Talking Machine Corporation

For his pressing plant, evidence suggests that Heineman acquired the facilities of Horace Sheble's recently defunct Domestic Talking Machine Corporation.

Sheble was one of the pioneers of the American phonograph industry, if a bit of a rogue, as well as a persistent thorn in the side of the major record manufacturers. With partner Ellsworth A. Hawthorne, he founded the Philadelphia firm of Hawthorne & Sheble in or around 1894 to deal in Edison products. Almost from the start, the company showed little regard for patents and licensing agreements. After being blacklisted by Edison in 1900, Hawthorne & Sheble turned to manufacturing after-market accessories and parts for Edison phonographs. Eventually, the company tunred to producing its own records and complete phonographs. In 1904, Hawthorne and Sheble joined forces with John O. Prescott (brother of International Talking Machine's Frederick M. Prescott) to market a series of distinctive blue-shellac discs manufactured by the American Record Company, the U.S. affiliate of the Berlin-based the International Talking, makers of Odeon records. The American venture was forced out of business as the result of patent litigation in 1907. Hawthorne and Sheble carried on minus Prescott (who in 1908 attempted, apparently without success, to introduce his Champion TwoforOne disc), producing Star records and phonographs until the business was absorbed by Columbia around 1910.

Horace Sheble surfaced again in 1916, as founder of the Domestic Talking Machine Corporation of Philadelphia. A trademark application, filed on June 22, 1916, claimed use of the Domestic brand on phonographs since February 4 of that year. Records apparently were an afterthought; neither the trademark application nor the 1917 Talking Machine World trade directory mentioned Domestic discs.

Domestic's first records were 7-inch fine-groove vertical cut discs produced by the Domino Record Company, a short-lived venture unrelated to the 1920s label of the same name. They were announced in the November 1916 Talking Machine World. An 8-inch series, produced by Operaphone and duplicating material on that company's fine-groove vertical cut discs, followed a short time later.

In November 1917, Sheble announced an entirely new line of Domestic records. He had acquired a pressing plant in Springfield, Massachusetts—almost certainly the site of his former American Record Company facility—and was once again producing discs in the same distinctive blue shellac that more a decade earlier had graced Hawthorne, Sheble & Prescott's American Record Company pressings. The new vertical-cut Domestics were playable with either steel or sapphire point and were offered in 10- and 12-inch series. Some of the latter offered three selections per disc.

Domestic blue-shellac record, 1917
A Domestic blue-shellac issue, 1917

Sheble took an active hand in designing the Domestic phonograph line. Patent records show that he assigned rights to several phonograph cabinet designs to the company in 1916, and he also worked closely with inventor Thomas Kramer, an associate from the American Record Company days. In a 1916 TMW interview, Sheble characterized his new products as suited to those who "enjoy all the comforts of life without false extravagances." But the Domestic line vanished suddenly, and the last known Domestic records were released in January, 1918. The label was later revived briefly by a company in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, which simply relabeled Operaphone pressings.

For many years, collectors assumed that Heineman produced the last Domestic series, based on similarities in the pressings and 1000-series catalog numbers that seemed to coincide with Okeh's. We now know, however, that this was not the case.

The lack of a Domestic connection becomes obvious when comparing Talking Machine World release lists for Domestic and Okeh. The two company's masters do not correlate in any way. Domestic's version of "Over There," for example, was performed by Meyer and Campbell, whereas Okeh offered a different version by the Sterling Trio (Burr, Meyer, and Campbell). But the most convincing bit of evidence appears when comparing the dates of these release lists. Domestic vanishes from the TMW listings in January, 1918, five months before the first Okehs were announced. Clearly, Domestic's demise preceded Okeh's introduction by many months, and thus Domestic could not have been pressed from Okeh masters.

Did Okeh purchase the Domestic plant? No exact statement to that effect has been found in TMW, but the purchase seems likely, based on strong circumstantial evidence. Okeh began pressing in Springfield, Massachusetts just a few months after Domestic ceased operations in the same city. The typefaces seen in the wax of Domestic and Okeh pressings are identical, a fact that caused many collectors to misattribute the pressings to Okeh. And finally, there is a business connection between Heineman and Sheble. Heineman was a part-owner of, and received financial support from, the Lindström Company of Berlin, successor to the International Talking Machine Company, with which Sheble's American Record Company of 1904–07 had been affiliated.

Sheble went his own way after Domestic's demise. At one point he placed a personal ad in TMW offering his services as an independent consultant to start-up record companies.

Otto Heineman and the Birth of Okeh

Early in the twentieth century, Otto Heineman, in partnership with Max Strauss and Heinrich Zunz, purchased Carl Lindström Aktien-Gesellschaft, a small manufacturing plant in Berlin, for the newly formed International Talking Machine Company (makers of Odeon records). Heineman came to the United States in 1914, with his brother Adolph, to study industrial conditions for the rapidly expanding Lindström organization.

Stranded in the U.S. at the outbreak of German hostilities, the Heineman brothers formed an import company at 45 Broadway, New York. In 1915, Otto contracted with the Garford Manufacturing Company of Elyria, Ohio, to produce high-quality phonograph motors to his specifications, and in December 1915 he incorporated his new business at the Otto Heineman Phonograph Supply Company, Inc. (25 West Forty-Fifth Street, New York). Heineman initially sold only motors, a lucrative line at a time when dozens of new phonograph lines were being introduced, and his 1918 trademark application claimed use of the phrase "The Motor of Quality" since September 1915.

In April 1917, Heineman purchased the Meisselbach motor factory at Newark, New Jersey, and in late 1917 he diversified a bit, purchasing the John M. Dean needle factory at Putnam, Connecticut. By 1918, the Heineman company was a major supplie
r of high-quality phonograph motors, reproducers, needles, and parts, although Heineman himself expressed no interest in building complete phonographs.

In early 1918, Heineman began production of vertically cut Okeh records, supposedly taking the name from an Indian word that, coincidentally, displayed his initials very nicely as originally designed. Heineman's strategy had been to buy existing, well-established companies to manufacture his products, and he remained true to form in creating his Okeh label, acquiring the former Rex-Imperial studio (and with it, veteran recording engineer Charles A. Hibbard and musical director Fred Hager), and probably acquiring Horace Sheble's Domestic pressing plant in Springfield. Heineman retained Imperial's advertising slogan, "The Record of Quality," for his new label.

The first Okeh releases (10-inch vertically cut discs bearing dark blue labels with an Indian-head trademark) were announced to the trade in May 1918. The label was slightly modified soon after its introduction to remove the banner that ran across its center, and some pressings are known that bear the older and newer versions on opposite sides.

First Okeh record label, 1918
The first Okeh label, 1918. The center banner was removed after a few issues.

Okeh's early catalogs offered little to set the label apart from its many competitors. Run-of-the-mill pop, standard, and light classical material by the usual New York-area studio free-lancers predominated, and early advertisements didn't even bother to cite artist credits. Trade journals praised the new label, a judgment that might have been influenced more by Okeh's massive advertising campaign than by the records themselves. Sales seem to have been weak, if present-day rarity is any indication.

The General Phonograph Corporation

On October 1, 1919, Otto Heineman officially reorganized his company as the General Phonograph Corporation. Financed by and closely allied with the powerful Carl Lindström organization (which by that time was producing Beka, Da Capo, Favorite, Fonotipia, and Parlophone records in addition to Odeon), Heineman introduced a new line of standard lateral-cut Okeh discs in the same month, still bearing the blue Indian-head labels but with the legend "LATERAL RECORD" added in oversized type. The blue labels were soon replaced by a slightly redesigned version gold on red that retained the Indian trademark. By 1920, when the Indian trademark finally gave way to Okeh's distinctive script trademark, sales and technical quality were improving steadily,

Okeh might have gone the way of so many other uninspired start-ups but for an accidental hit that cast it in a new and unexpected role. The story of Mamie Smith's "Crazy Blues" (Okeh 4169), the first authentic vocal blues record, is too well known to bear repeating here, but its release in November 1920 revealed a vast, untapped market for recordings by black performers. Its unexpectedly strong sales pointed Okeh in an exciting new direction. Foregoing the stodginess that then characterized the American recording establishment at the time, Okeh soon began to scour the nation for performers and material that was often far removed from the mainstream. In the process, it would reshape the American recording industry as perhaps no other label had to that point.

Selected References

Advance Record Bulletins. Talking Machine World (monthly, 11/15/1916 - 1/15/1921)

Blacker, George. "Pennsylvania Vertical Group." Record Research 131 (1/1975)

Blacker, George. "Pennsylvania Vertical Group Update." Record Research 146/147 (5 - 6/1977)

Carson Pirie Scott & Co. "Domestic Talking Machines - Domestic Blue Records"  (advertisement). Talking Machine World (10/15/1917)

Domestic Talking Machine Corp.: "Domestic." U.S. Patent Office: Trademark application  #96,052 (filed 6/22/1916)

Empire Talking Machine Co. "Empire." U.S. Patent Office: Trademark application #91,603  (filed 12/20/1915)

Empire Talking Machine Co. "The Empire Proposition Is a Big Winner" (advertisement).  Talking Machine World (9/15/1916)

"Empire Talking Machine Co. News." Talking Machine World (9/15/1918)

"Heineman Okeh Record Now Ready for the Trade." Talking Machine World (5/15/1918)

Imperial Talking Machine Corp.: "Imperial Records" (advertisement). Talking Machine World (2/15/1918)

"Keen-O-Phone Company Incorporated." Talking Machine World (2/15/1908)

Otto Heineman Phonograph Supply Co., Inc.: "Okeh." U.S. Patent Office: Trademark  application #116,453 (filed 3/11/1919)

Otto Heineman Phonograph Supply Co., Inc. "Okeh - The Record of Quality." U.S. Patent Office:  Trademark application #112,064 (filed 7/11/1918)

"Otto Heineman's 20th Anniversary in Industry." Talking Machine World (12/15/1922)

"Sheble Talks of 'Domestic' Age." Talking Machine World (8/15/1916)

Trade Directory. Talking Machine World (11/15/1917)



Site © 2006 by MAINSPRING PRESS, LLC. Additional content is copyright as noted. All worldwide rights are reserved.

No portion of the material on this site may be reproduced, altered, or distributed in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of the copyright holder(s). Unauthorized use constitutes a violation of federal copyright and other statutes.

For permission to reproduce from any Mainspring Press online or print publication, e-mail the publisher.